Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Review: Russia's 'Sputnik' combines sci-fi, horror and Cold War tropes to great effect


Pyotr Fyodorov as “Konstantin Veshnyakov” in Egor Abramenko’s SPUTNIK. Courtesy of IFC Midnight. An IFC Midnight Release.
Pyotr Fyodorov as “Konstantin Veshnyakov” in Egor Abramenko’s SPUTNIK. Courtesy of IFC Midnight. An IFC Midnight Release.
Facebook Share IconTwitter Share IconEmail Share Icon

Sputnik
3.5 out of 5 Stars
Director:
Egor Abramenko
Writer: Oleg Malovichko, Andrei Zolotarev
Starring: Oksana Akinshina, Fedor Bondarchuk, Pyotr Fyodorov
Genre: Sci-fi, Horror
Rated: Unrated

SALT LAKE CITY (KUTV) —Synopsis: In 1983, two cosmonauts returning from an orbital mission are attacked by a creature just as they enter the Earth’s atmosphere. Only one survives, but his ability to quickly heal from his injuries raises suspicion. Tucked away in a military lab, the cosmonaut is closely studied by scientists and military officials.

Review: Like most 2020 films, “Sputnik” was intended to be experienced in a cinema, but the COVID-19 pandemic forced the movie to make its debut on a variety of Russian streaming services where it was watched by more than one million people. Those numbers made the movie the most-streamed title in Russia in the past two years.

Popularity doesn’t guarantee quality, but in this case the public’s enthusiasm is mirrored by the film’s use of sci-fi tropes, Cold War era politics and an effective amount of horror. “Sputnik” isn’t dominated by violence, but those scenes are among the film’s most unforgettable. The most memorable being a mix of “Alien” and a David Cronenberg body horror films from the 1970s (which seem to be a major source of influence on contemporary horror/thrillers right now).

The characters are all flawed. Some by ambition, others by a desire and willingness to work outside of what is traditionally allowed or considered ethical. They each incorporate a “means to an end” policy with varying and an often-evolving senses of morality. Their actions seem motivated and plausible. It’s not high art, but it is sturdy screenwriting.

I found a subplot that takes place in an orphanage to be an unnecessary bit of misdirection. It does provide something of a twist, but it is primarily just a distraction that slows the momentum of the main narrative. If you’re paying attention, the surprise is revealed from the start. I initially thought it was a translation error.

If you like a mixture of horror and sci-fi with a different political subtext, “Sputnik” comes highly recommended.


Loading ...